The whole control sample gives an unequivocal answer to the Zelen test.
The planet Mars is rising and culminating in "key sectors" in greater proportion for sports champions than for the total of all other births registered on the same days in the same place as the champions. Figure 3, taken from the Zelen test report, graphically illustrates the main empirical evidence. Figure 3. Zelen Test. Mars in Key Sectors for sports champions versus other births. At the moment, there is no longer any doubt about the validity of my methodology.
This acknowledgment caused a considerable stir! Doubts, however, remained among skeptics. These doubts raised Professor Ertel's curiosity. This theory of eminence was objectified by Ertel with the help of citation frequencies, a sensitive procedure I myself had not yet used. The entire total of 4, sports champions was subjected to this procedure. The results of this experiment clearly support the eminence theory.
Mars effect percentages increase steadily from champions in rank one lowest of a citation scale to champions in rank five highest Figure 4. Fudging the data or unintentionally distorting it by bias, Ertel concludes, would never have produced a functional relation, based on a vast amount of specific lexico-biographical and historical information Ertel, Figure 4. Eminence Effect for Mars.
Charts > Chart drawing styles
The eminence effect for Mars among champions confirmed by Professor Ertel's experiment. The Mars effect increases when the citation frequencies increase for details see text. The ranges of confidence increase with ranks, which is due to decreasing numbers of individuals [see text]. Having now heard the testimony of all doubters, who have answered every one of their own arguments with the help of objective experiments, one must reasonably conclude that there is very strong scientific evidence in favor of the reality of the Mars effect.
Obituary by Hans Eysenck. The Independent 20 June 1991
Ertel, S. Gauquelin, M. Aquarian Press, Wellingborough, U. Jerome, L.
Frequently asked questions
Kammann, R. Porte, J. Foreword for M. I was just looking up Addey's comments on astrologer significators in the chart can't find, at the moment, but it involved Uranus and Neptune, if memory serves and ran across much more of interest. Addey is a compiler extraordinaire!
Why Astrology Works – procitserrankwun.ml
Quote from: Stacy on January 22, , AM. Here is the description under the chapter headline. Just to give a brief bibliography of sorts. Quote from: Stacy on January 23, , AM. A natal planet in one of these sectors will arc to an Angle in childhood suggesting a prominent - lasting - influence. Barbara Ybarra Hero Member Posts: Gauquelin's work unfortunately was so undervalued, and yet he may have done the most to bridge the gap between science and astrology.
The proximity to an angle seems to be the important point in that theory rather than what the vocation is, because there are plenty of people with Mars in the Gauquelin sector who are not suited for athletics nor entertainment but have other vocations that are suggested spelled out by the Midheaven extension process. The Mars energy in that area does play a significant role in the career choice, perhaps by bringing at the early age when solar arc conjuncts it with angle , a mentor, a person for inspiration. Personally, I have always, from my earliest studies of astrology, had trouble understanding why the 12th house should concern the unconscious and collective energies, the ones that are the most difficult to express, when it is the literal rising area of our sky, bringing what was hidden to visibility.
There is more to my problem than what meets the eye, you could say. But, like Neptune, which sometimes is association with repression, energies imprisoned in the 12th house need to be released, or the individual suffers from clogged arteries, or clogged lymph nodes, or clogged intestines, etc. The first diagram shows a composite line made by FG, where she seems to have added together the different planetary-career results: 'very successful people broken line are in obvious contrast to Martinek's results with drug addicts black bars.
The peaks obtained with drug addicts were in obvious contrast to the low frequencies in "Cadent houses" our "key-sectors" numbered 1, 4, 7 and 10, in the direction of the daily motion of the planets.
- jonathan cainer virgo love horoscope!
- astrology scorpio february 11 2020!
- aquarius january 22 compatibility?
- Mark Pottenger;
With prominent professional notabilities, we obtain the exactly reversed graph see continuous line in our Figure 1. This "anti-correlation" is statistically significant. It finds its causal justification in the personality differences of both groups, the successful celebrities obtaining recognition by fighting efficaciously the difficulties of life, and the drug addicts receding from these difficulties into the blissful oblivion of narcotics.
There is a result, in our professional groups, which offers a similar contrast see our Figure 2 : the painters, musicians and poets form a group of artists oriented more towards contemplation than action, while the sports champions and military men prefer action to contemplation; their planetary results on the whole show the same "anti-correlation" as the drug addicts compared to the successful celebrities; and the anti-correlation reaches its maximum if we consider the results with the planet Mars.
That sounds similar to the introvert-extravert polarity on which she had published a few years earlier, but she did not say that.
Thus the scores they obtained were -. For scores of all 35 trait-terms, see here. The average values of these scores were then plotted against the strength of a planet in terms of the percentage excess or deficit in the four cadent houses at birth, as compared to the other houses as described in the previous section. The Mars graph is shown for the 35 traits. The correlation here is highly significant. That means that these three traits were found in biographies of persons having Mars in cadent houses at birth, twice as frequently as in the other houses.
The Saturn-graph here shown goes in the other direction, i. Thus we endorse the approach which the Gauquelins took on this matter in their paper, but may have improved upon the methodology. Malcolm Dean, its Canadian editor, had a breezy optimism, but alas his journal only lasted a few years. Using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, the authors found a quite simple effect, whereby alternate sun-signs tended to be extravert Aries, Gemini, etc and then introvert Taurus, Cancer, etc. Other academic psychologists were able to replicate this effect, eg Prof Alan Smithers and Heather Cooper found very similar results, published a decade later in the same Journal of Social Psychology.
Some debate ensued over whether this effect only appeared with people selected because they knew about astrology. Well-known British astrologers such as Dr Nick Campion vehemently rejected the claim which Eysenck and Nias had made in their book Astrology: Science or Superstition that the effect was caused by people reading sun-sign columns! Did these columns lead people to perceive themselves as introvert or extravert? The subject has been well reviewed, together with another positive-result confirmation using non-astrological subjects, by members of a Dutch psychology department in